DOJ Lawsuit Targets CVS for Controlled Substances Violations Amid Opioid Crisis The Department of Justice (DOJ) has filed a lawsuit against CVS Health, accusing the pharmaceutical company of contributing to the opioid crisis by purposely filling illegal prescriptions to enhance corporate performance metrics. In the civil complaint unsealed on Wednesday, the government claims CVS filled prescriptions for controlled substances without a valid medical reason from October 17, 2023, to the present. In response, CVS maintains all prescriptions filled were lawful, arguing the lawsuit imposes an unreasonable standard for pharmacy practice. A spokesperson stated that each questioned prescription was for FDA-approved medications, prescribed by licensed practitioners. DEA's Position: Law enforcement officials have reacted strongly, emphasizing that CVS prioritized profits over its responsibility to ensure customer safety. The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) vowed to continue holding accountable those who jeopardize community safety in the ongoing fight against the opioid epidemic. This lawsuit underscores the ongoing scrutiny faced by CVS and similar companies in the context of the opioid crisis.Background of the Lawsuit
Allegations Against CVS
Profits Over Patient Safety: The lawsuit asserts CVS failed to perform its critical role as a gatekeeper against dangerous prescription opioids.Impact of Staffing Levels: Low staffing levels made pharmacists vulnerable to fake prescriptions from dishonest prescribers.Violation of Federal Laws: CVS allegedly violated the Controlled Substances Act and improperly sought reimbursement for unlawful prescriptions.CVS's Response
Law Enforcement's Stance
CVS's History of Controversies
In recent months, CVS Caremark faced an investigation into possible antitrust violations.Back in 2011, CVS settled for $17.5 million over inflated prescription claims submitted to Medicaid.
This article was prepared using information from open sources in accordance with the principles of Ethical Policy. The editorial team is not responsible for absolute accuracy, as it relies on data from the sources referenced.
有话要说...